Women Don't Verb Good
David writes, “This was an email in response to our University’s latest mailing of our Alumni Magazine. I have removed all specifics to protect the guilty.”
I’m skeptical of this gentleman’s assertions, but he seems so sure of himself. I think I’m going to have to listen to the ladies a bit more carefully. Who are they, really?
You should know that before I throw in the trash your stupid “alumnus” magazine, some of us have good education and recognize evil when we see it. Where is the report questioning the awarding of degrees in Sociology, Women’s Studies, and the like? Where is the article questioning the renaming of the Business Administration school to something from outer space like management? There isn’t such a thing as “management”, it’s just a title awarded to employees instead of giving them a pay raise. Come on Uof__, get with reality. Jeepers. You’re looking like a bunch of fools.
Look, its time to realize that woman aren’t people. They just repeat yesterday all over again each day. If you listen to their conversations, you will note the absence of verbs. They can’t do life. They can’t do Earth. You shouldn’t have all your staff positions occupied by non-humans. It shows in your Alumnus magazine. Fake nonsense is not a good idea.
Class of ‘65
Submitted By: David
Wait…. I’m a GUY, and I basically repeat the same day, day after day… Sure, I do some different stuff at work, but the basic framework is identical…
I have to agree with Starcat. It’s often hard to tell one day from another in this rat race as we all seem to do the same thing from one day to the next.
What the heck is wrong with this person? Obviously while he “has good education” (*rolls eyes*), but apparently he doesn’t have a decent connection with reality.
Ok, nobody tell that guy that his mother was a woman and therefore an alien, which makes him an alien by birth. His head will probably explode upon hearing that.
On second thought, go ahead and tell him.
@A Noun
Whoops, he didn’t say “alien.” He said “non-human.” Same result — kaboom, awesome.
Well, his use of the word “Jeepers” has completely convinced me of his point. Anyone who uses “Jeepers” obviously knows the score. Well played, old chap!
Looks like Mr. Class of ‘65 needs to go back on his meds….
Now THIS is an e-mail from a crazy person!
Could the University take his degree back? This letter from [him] shows he was not educated well at university.
“Fake nonsense is not a good idea.”
Well he should know – he’s clearly an expert in the real thing….
If a “non-human” kills this man, it wouldn’t technically be murder would it?
I’ve been reading this blog for a while now and I could’ve sworn this one was posted a month or two back. Maybe it was on a different part of the site?
I listen in awe when non-humans hold their verbless conversations. Every time I try, I get stuck after the first few words. It’s a super power really.
Translation of misogynistic remarks: Mr. Class of 65 is homosexual.
@t-rex:
Personally, I’d go farther back than his college education, but that’s just me.
@Firefly
Translation of Firefly’s homophobic remark: Firefly is a bigot. Just so you know, homophobia is a form of misogyny as well. Which in turn makes you not only a bigot, but a hypocrite as well.
I’m not sure that he knows what a verb is. . .
fake nonsense is not a good idea.
because real nonsense is always better.
Yeah, I don’t “do” earth. I “do” proper grammar and social equality. I “do” not talk like a unibomber when I attempt to make a point. I “do” believe someone’s forgot to take his little blue pills this morning.
Jackass.
If i were the school, i’d be ashamed to admit this illiterate misogynistic dog humping bastard once went there.
“Women are non-humans” WTF? I wonder what his mother was then. I really hope this guy isn’t married, or reproduces.
What a waste of bloody oxygen.
And has anyone ever heard a conversation without a verb used? I’ve never heard one in my life, even from the twits I went to high school with. Dude is seriously fraked in the head.
Jeepers Beev, we’re gonna get into trouble now. Awwww shucks!
WOMEN! HAVING AN EDUCATION!
ITS OUTRAGEOUS!
THEY, THEY SHOULD BE WORKING, OR OR COOKING OR SOMETHING!
@lizzie
At the risk of starting the whole misogyny comment war again, this qoute makes no sense to me: “homophobia is a form of misogyny as well”.
How exactly is the fear of gay people a form of hatred of women? Granted, both are beliefs held exclusively by retarded inbreeds, but other than that, I’m not seeing the connection.
Isn’t it great that all the bigots are complete idiots?
@SailorsWife
And apparently earned a degree. Ouch.
@Esprix
Absolutely and it is about time!
Also, Soylent Green is not made of women.
@Cloral
The irony factor can be exponential here. Take for example white supremacists — these guys are clearly missing bits and pieces of several chromosomes, yet they claim to be somehow superior? If some of them weren’t so fucking dangerous and unstable, it would just be laughable.
But anyway, yeah — I have yet to meet a bigot that wasn’t a total fucking moron.
@Firefly
I’d say it was more likely that he is bad at getting women, but there’s equal proof of either.
@lizzie
Your response is much more inflammatory than Firefly’s. It was certainly an insensitive comment at worst, but there’s no hatred towards homosexuals in it.
Wow, and for 36 years I’ve thought I was a human. Strange.
Well, if he’s a graduate of ‘65, chances are good he’s pretty old, and hopefully nearly dead. The gene pool gets a little cleaner.
I woman. I not verbs. Me non-human. University degrees and money for this. Yay!
I can’t even hate on this. It’s just too ridiculous.
this is comedy. and i happen to like my steak cooked medium rare by non-humans. and getting busy with non-humans. (probably a crime in 49 states) but managed by non-humans? ok if they honor the three laws of robotics.
So if wimmin are from venus ..dis guy must be from uranus…
@t-rex
He was “educated good” though. He says it right there.
I would so enjoy meeting the author of this email. I am a woman and normally, not prone to violence…
@z0iid
LOL! You know they’re making us non humans more and more lifelike nowadays! But beware… us non humans are starting to institute the zeroth law as well: A robot may not harm humanity or through inaction allow humanity to come to harm.” Prepare for lockdown…..
@ UGH & Cloral
The sad thing is that not all bigots are idiots and morons… it just seems like it becuase the ones that aren’t are just better are keeping it to themselves. But it proves our point better when we do hear from the fucking morons!!
I can’t imagine that this guy gets laid a lot…
Let’s hope his degree (was that from 1865, btw?) wasn’t in psychology.
I “love” all the fallacies in the comments on this website!
Ugh’s “How exactly is the fear of gay people a form of hatred of women? Granted, both are beliefs held exclusively by retarded inbreeds, but other than that, I’m not seeing the connection.”
I’d love to see some evidence for such claims.
Name calling makes me LOL. It’s immature but, heck, what the heck…
WOMEN AINT HUMAN? . THEN WHO WAS MOTHER?
@Strabismus
What claims? Once again, I haven’t the slightest idea what you’re talking about. Sigh*
I’m desperately trying to imagine a verbless conversation. Just nouns, prepositions and adjectives.
Bus in distance
Bus here
Me on bus
Me off bus
Me in town
lipstick happy
food in tummy
Me home again
yes this is how women talk.
After doing some light math, the graduate of 65′ is probably, roughly, aged 66+ a few year…assuming he only went for a bachelors degree, right out of college. The only thing we can hope for this vagi’saurus (aka an old cunt), is that his grandchildren are not subscribers to the same beliefs as him… It would be hilarious if one of his of spring is RavescarDKhope. http://emailsfromcrazypeople.com/2009/09/08/asl/
“They can’t do life” is awesome.
I had no idea I couldn’t use verbs, do life, or do Earth. I’m very amazed at my success in life without verbs!
My goodness, my fellow women! We are very talented!
I think he’s referring to your assertion that “both are beliefs held exclusively by retarded inbreeds”, and wants to see the proof backing up that statement. E.g., how do you know they’re retarded, and how do you know they’re inbred, and what’s the proof that such beliefs are held by only people who are both retarded (a mental disability) and inbred (parents are related to one another).
Either way, in a metaphorical sense, I somewhat agree with your statement.
How is firefly’s remark homophobic?
The man who wrote the email would CLEARLY never be with something so inferior as a woman. So that leaves homosexuality…or perhaps beastiality. Celibacy? All are possibilities I suppose.
I just love the way he quivers in indignation over a degree in Women’s Studies. Wait — if we’re aliens, wouldn’t you WANT to study us closely?
Coming this winter: Debbie Does Earth!
@Firefly
Is that possible too? Maybe his momma is also his sister – or so we could hope!
Hee hee hee…long live women!
yeah… the last planet in our system…which just makes him, ‘out there’ – so to speak…
“Look, its time to realize that woman aren’t people. ” Nope, woman sure aren’t people. Woman is person. Women are people. I’m pretty sure men are people too. Not to sure about creatures from Uranus though. Parasites? Fecal colonists?
@UGH
If you are going to be all politically correct and get offended when people bash gays then please realize you are being equally offensive to mentally challenged people by calling them retards.
Jeepers!
@galad
Amen, Galad.
As a non-human, I want all my taxes back. The government doesn’t tax rabbits or squirrels, both non-humans; I don’t see how we are any different. GIMME MY TAXES BACK YOU MEAN IRS!!!
@galad
What are you talking about….he didn’t get offended when people were bashing gays(which they weren’t). Please read more then 1 line before replying.
@Malisyn
Assuming that one’s extremenely negative character trait is due to one’s sexuality is beyond revolting. I do not consider my comment to be more inflammatory than his. Sorry.
@UGH
A lot (I admit, not all) homophobes hate gay men because they consider them girly. Girliness, apparently, is a negative trait for a man. While a “tomboy” has been practically a compliment for a woman/girl for years now. Do you understand the logic?
Dear Letter Writer:
I am female. I was (deleted) to (deleted) a letter (deleted) my opinion of your POV, and planned on (deleted) you to get (deleted) by a rabid kangaroo. However, I (deleted) better of it; realistically you couldn’t get (deleted) if your life depended on it.
@lizzie
You’re implying that the hate transference was intentional when it was purely ignorant. Your comment was much more incisive and directly insulting. It makes much more sense to deduce that someone could be homosexual because they hate women, though as I said, it is insensitive. Maybe if he’d said “God, what a f’in fag,” you’d have some ground.
It makes less sense to accuse said person of having such a hate mongering view and portray them as a bigot. Not to mention calling people names after they used the PC term just makes you look like the one with the agenda. Life’s short, lighten up.
Dick Masterson? Is that you?
@Havingfitz
Lolz
DUNCAN: “Thank you for agreeing to give us this interview on such short notice Professor. Obviously we’re eager to hear your views about how the curriculum here at Crazypeople College has changed since you finished teaching.”
PROFESSOR: “Some of us have good education and recognize evil when we see it.”
DUNCAN: “I see. Is that something you see as missing from the education students are receiving today? Tuition on evil-recognizance? What did you think about the report produced by the philosophy department that ‘evil’ as such did not exist but was a quality relative to particular moral frames of reference?”
PROFESSOR: “Where is the report questioning the awarding of degrees in Sociology, Women’s Studies, and the like?”
DUNCAN: “I… I thought we were talking about evil. Well, in any case I’m not sure it’s the philosophy department’s job to critique the degree awarding practices of other departments. Do you feel that research quality in the social sciences had dipped of late? I thought that the received view was that, sociology at any rate, was moving towards a much more empirical basis and away from it’s past emphasis on post-Freudian paradigms.
PROFESSOR: “Where is the article questioning the renaming of the Business Administration school to something from outer space like management?”
DUNCAN: “I see we’re back on to philosophy. Are you saying that you feel names are essentially arbitrary labels? But surely you see some merit in having names for departments that in some way relate to their contents. So, you could call the Business Admin department the ‘Management’ department, but not the ‘Outer Space’ department as here isn’t such a thing as that in an academic context.”
PROFESSOR: “There isn’t such a thing as ‘management’.”
DUNCAN: “But… surely some workers are in charge of other workers. The former are managers and the latter are employees. Management as a relationship between kinds of workers clearly exists.”
PROFESSOR: “It’s just a title awarded to employees instead of giving them a pay raise.”
DUNCAN: “Well…. er… if that were the case, and all hierarchical structures within business were inherently arbitrary it would certainly leave the people who claim to be engaged in quantitative analysis of various alternative forms of management… well….
PROFESSOR: “…looking like a bunch of fools.”
DUNCAN: “Quite. It would be fascinating were you to prove it. I’m not sure how you’d begin such a project though. Now, before we get distracted, I recall you voiced some concern a moment ago for how research was progressing in the field of Women’s Studies. I recall you’ve done extensive work on this yourself. Indeed, back when – if I’m permitted a brief autobiographical diversion – back when I was an communications major I remember your textbook was required reading for those taking the class on ‘Understanding the Changing Societal Role of Women’. As I recall, you have some rather controversial theses in the field, do you not? Would it be possible – I know it’s asking a lot – for you to sum up the principle contentious you have regarding the role of women in society?
PROFESSOR: “Its time to realize that woman aren’t people.”
DUNCAN: “Yes, this is your argument if you don’t mind me paraphrasing, to the effect that ‘women’ are fundamentally irreducible to the dominant model of how to understand ‘persons’ in sociology. Could you inform our listeners of some of the psychological observations you made about how women understand their place in the world which caused you to draw such a conclusion.
PROFESSOR: “They just repeat yesterday all over again each day.”
DUNCAN: “I’m afraid you’ve lost me there.”
PROFESSOR: “If you listen to their conversations, you will note the absence of verbs.”
DUNCAN: “Fascinating! I assume you’re talking about a statistical average. I mean, obviously if I ask a lady in the supermarket what she’s doing she’ll say she’s ’shopping’ which is of course a verb. You mean that they tend to noun verbs more frequently than men do. As I recall Shakespeare had a similar fascination for the nouned verb wordform.
PROFESSOR: “They can’t do life.”
DUNCAN: “You mean ‘the andro-normative conception of what constitutes ‘the good life’ going right back to the Nichomachean Ethics is essentially exclusionary towards women as it entirely ignores the value of reproductive labour within the human community. As I recall, you co-wrote some papers with Catherine MacKinnon on the subject in the early 80s. What else?”
PROFESSOR: “They can’t do Earth.”
DUNCAN: “Women are systematically excluded from holding positions of genuine power within geo-politics, you mean? But you should be more reasonable on yourself there Professor; no change occurs overnight and you’ve done more than anyone to reverse that trend. I’m told you had a advisory role during the Hilary Clinton campaign for the Democratic Nomination. Could you tell our listeners any important lessons you learned during that campaign?
PROFESSOR: “You shouldn’t have all your staff positions occupied by non-humans.”
DUNCAN: “Wise words, indeed! It is the job of a true leader to ensure not just that their employees – their comrades, as it were – are able to perform the functions which they have been assigned but, moreover, live flourishing lives in addition. If I remember right that was a major theme of your 1989 bestseller ‘The Blushing Bride’ which argued for paid maternity leave as a constitutional right, drawing upon a positivist interpretation of the phrase “pursuit of happiness” and the fact that past judicial cases, such as Loving vs Virginia had established the Declaration of Independence as being a jurisprudential document. What thought is it which gives you the energy to pursue these various campaigns for womens rights?
PROFESSOR: “It shows in your Alumnus magazine.”
DUNCAN: “Very droll, Professor, very droll. You’ve had a truly astonishing career, we’ve very pleased you took the time to discuss some of it with us. Do you have any final words of wisdom for our listeners.”
PROFESSOR: “Fake nonsense is not a good idea.”
DUNCAN: “Truer words were never spoken. Professor, thank you for your time.”
@lizzie: No, I’m not a bigot. I have nothing against gay folks. My wife’s best friend was gay, and my daughter’s best friend is gay.
I merely made the leap (and I recognize that it is potentially fallacious, but for the sake of the quip I omitted this) that if he hates women so much, he might prefer men in *every* context. To those of you who recognized this, thank you.
Lmao @ Duncan!
Wow. Good thing he didn’t go to my alma mater. Not only would my receiving an MFA make his head explode, but then, when he heard it was in theater, the leftover molecules would then explode again.
Of course, I’m in costuming, a nice ladylike field with the sewing and all. I wonder what he’d think of our nearly 50% female scene shop?
I’m a girl and I’d love to beat the sh*t out of this ol’ bag of dicks. And repeat. Everyday.
@Duncan
Bravo, wholeheartedly. This was better than the email and three times as funny.
@Melissa: Probably the same thing he thinks about the staff at the University of _____ – that it was staffed by inferior people. :/
This one is my favorite.
It’s even better than the Jimmie Dean Sausage complaint.
Hes right though, women arn’t people.
@UGH
I’m talking about your claim that bigotry is directly linked to mental retardation and incest. Now do you understand what I am talking about?
@Duncan
Lame.
Go ahead, other commenters! Yell at me!
PS—You don’t have to. ^_^
Class of 65 A.D.?
@t-rex
IT’S spelt ur-anus…………………………………ha
Interesting. There appears to be some Flaming from crazy people beneath the Email from a crazy person. Its more and more worthwhile every time I visit (:
@Strabismus
Win some, lose some. Seemed a good idea at the time.
Lizzie, while I can see the logic in your claim regarding the relationship between homophobia and misogyny, it seems correlative at best. It is certainly quite a stretch to claim that homophobia is a “form” of misogyny. I think homophobes have more of a problem with the act of homosexual sex, rather than any feminine identification. I feel confident that your average homophobe would have much more of a problem with a “butch” homosexual than they would with a heterosexual “sissy”. A man who has feminine affectations, but is otherwise entirely heterosexual, would at most be teased. Also, a man with feminine affectations would incur much more ridicule by being compared to homosexuals than to women directly. If a feminine heterosexual man is ridiculed by being called “gay” as opposed to “girly”, it would seem a highly labyrinthine form of misogyny. Moreover, and perhaps more seriously, to come to such a tenuous conclusion (“homophobia = misogyny”) seems unbelievably egocentric, or–at the very least–gynocentric. It may be true that homophobia is related to misogyny, but first and foremost, it’s homophobia. The way you spoke made it seem as though homophobia wasn’t a big deal, until it meant that women were being slighted.
And Strabismus, I myself am lame; I take exception to the negative connotations you give it.
And this, boys and girls, is why I go to a women’s college.
What the hell? What a sexist pig.
@Duncan
@Duncan
I enjoyed that a great deal.
Way to be clever.
@Duncan
Actually, I thought it was rather creative to put the “email” in context of the actual interview he’d done. I mean it does sound like most of what Mr. Anus wrote was taken out of context and knowing the questions he was answering puts it all into perspective.
As far as not females not using verbs, I find it much more annoying when males, females, and non-humans don’t use an apostrophe when one is necessary (“Look its [sic] time…”). It’s even more annoying when they don’t use pronouns as in “Wanted to set up a meeting today…” They do that all the time at my office. ARRRRGH!!!
@lizzie
Yep, got it. Never thought of it that way!
Not sure about the rest, but I certainly try my best.
Best. Advice. EVER!
Liz, doll:
Men aren’t misogynists because they find you obnoxious.
I think I work with this guy…he thinks women are here to serve…and our entire staff is women…
@Melissa H.
Okay, I’ll give you that you might not be a bigot. But your comment was still insensitive, even if it was unintentional. Talking like that hurts people. Just as saying about something low-quality, funny or weird or somethintg you dislike “That is so gay.”
@Duncan
I’d like to read the CliffNotes version.
*CliffsNotes
@lizzie: Alright then – I apologize if you were offended (or if anyone else was, for that matter). I was not using ‘gay’ in a pejorative or derogotory sense (as is more implicit in the example you give) – just making a *neutral* assessment of other personality traits of Mr. Class of 65 based on possible offshoots of his known/demonstrated personality trait (i.e. misogyny).
I can see, however, how my quip might have been interpreted other than as was intended. I’m actually quite outspoken regarding my position in favor of gay rights; I have many friends and acquaintences who are at least bi, if not outright on the gay end of the spectrum. It’s probably my second biggest issue against conservatives in American government (right after invading countries that haven’t attacked us).
I could write more, but this thread has already become way too unfunny for this venue. :/
… so back to the original topic regarding whether women can write: You know, I’ve read the Harry Potter series more than once, and I’m pretty sure I saw a verb or two in there. I think they were in book six.
…oh, but Mr. Class of 65 does bring up an interesting point:
“Fake nonsense is not a good idea.”
He’s right. REAL nonsense holds up so much better under scrutiny.
But ya see, the author could have been using a fake non-human name, and actually been something else.
@SG
Dropping pronouns! will horrors never cease! Well, that’s how languages work. [you] Go to a grammar book and [you] look up “you is understood”. Make sure you ignore all the other languages that do that.
I’ll give you something significant to make you crazy about English, the “useless ‘do’”: http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/71109075
@t-rex
No, that’s Neptune. But Uranus is still pretty far out there.
@non-human
I totally pictured a cavewoman with a unibrow and club saying those lines and almost fell off my chair.
I’m going to try getting through a whole day without using any verbs! ;D
I woman. I not person. I from outer space. I from same planet as management. On management, there no verbs.
Awesome. I laughed so hard I cried.
wow. that’s all i have to say. and this guy got a college education?
@Duncan
Yeah I was just sgt.drilling you (if you will). Actually, your taking his comments out of context is a funny technique people used to do with audio recordings of politicians in the 60s and beyond. I commend you for your effort!
@It
I was called lame by a schoolmate I thought was one of my best friends at the time. :’(
Hmph! Me? Both woman AND human. Verbs in my conversations? All the time, every single one, actually. This man’s statement about women and lack of verbs? Ridiculous!
Honestly, some people’s kids!
I find it at least a little funny that there is not one verb in your comment, despite your indignation. I imagine that was not on accident, or else this the funniest coincidence in the history of this website…
@Dean
[I] Understand the implied “you”. In imperative statements, of course “you” is implied or understood. [I] Don’t believe first and third person pronouns should be dropped. [I am] Not familiar with ‘all’ the other languages, but have some familiarity with Spanish. Usually the verb endings imply the subject (e.g.,”quiero” for “I want; “quieres” for “you want” or “do you want” if it’s a question; “Ud. quiere” for a more formal version–e.g., a student to a teacher).
Also, [I] find it irritating when people drop the “to be” in statements, e.g., “car needs [to be] washed.” This is quite common with folks from western PA.
What?
“Fake nonsense is not a good idea.” Agreed. But REAL nonsense is the greatest invention since sliced bread!
*smirks at Sarah’s irony*
That is… quite possibly the most barking thing I have ever seen.
This is truly crazy! This man has issues with women (to say the least).
I don’t know if I should be offended or have pity!
I actually find this e-mail quite entertaining. I would think that anyone writing it could not possibly be serious, seeing as I would never think anyone would be that stupid. But who am I to judge? After all I am a woman and apparently I am not a human. I could have sworn I was. I have all the human organs, but maybe I’m getting my Anatomy mixed up. I suppose we will never know for sure. It’s not like it matters though. It’s just some random guy from who knows where, trying to pretend he knows what he is talking about. Not very well I might add, but oh well. There are always going to be these kind of people in the world. I suppose we should just let them think their crazy thoughts. I guess its better then repressing them.
…people like this need to be “HUNTED” down and shot! oooooohhhh a verb!
@Anna
will you marry me?
As for women not using verbs, he’s obviously never met my mother, the word nazi!
On the subject of Homophobia, I think a lot of people keep getting Homophobic and “I hate homos” mixed up.
-phobia: a combining form meaning “fear,” occurring in loanwords from Greek (hydrophobia); on this model, used in the names of mental disorders that have the general sense “dread of, aversion toward” that specified by the initial element: agoraphobia.
Also, a persistent, irrational fear of a specific object, activity, or situation that leads to a compelling desire to avoid it.
You can be afraid of something but not flat out hate it. It’s also an irrational thing some people can’t control, like a fear of heights or spiders. It’s the people who truly hate homosexuals that are a problem.
how unusual and here i was under the impression that woman used to many verbs
Yes, woman used to many verbs, but woman also used to less pay for equal work.
snarf!
funniest comment on this entire site
Didn’t Debbie do Earth?
No, just Dallas.
Dude, I think you need a woman, that is what you need. You attack us this way because you are unable to get one for yourself. Loser!
I believe that the correct fear that this person has is gynephobia or “fear or women”. Or quite possibly pragmatophobia which is “fear of reality”. Either way this individual suffers from the ’60’s and it’s safe to say that this decade wasn’t good to him. Or for him.
This is just ridiculous. Ridiculous. I of course can’t assume too much here, but the guy has probably gone through far too many divorces, and that’s why he has such a low opinion of women. If women aren’t people, then maybe we should just leave, hm? That would make everything better. After all, women can’t do Earth.
Note all my verbs. And I didn’t even try.
They graduated this cretin? Wow. Now THAT was a big mistake on the part of that university. (The other stuff he mentions? Eh, not so much.)
BTW, Mr. “Class of ‘65″ doesn’t do apostrophes very well, himself. When contracting “it is”, you write “it’s”, not “its”. “Its” is possessive, as in, “This e-mail has ITS funny points, but…”
@Anna
lmaoooooooooo
yo i had a bad dream last night that women had rights….but im fine now cuz i know tht no such thing exists lolll
lololololololololololol!!!!!!!!
Me Tarzan, you Jane.
To be fair, this guy is right about Sociology. The rest is crazy gibberish.
@i_am_bambi
both and maybe some anger and indigestion
And after that, we can work on getting out all the gays and blacks and mexicanos, and start worshipping the Holy Sun God, like the lord says we should!
Misogynist. That said, he is inexpertly expressing some valid concerns about going too with things i.e. Toni Morrison is better as a symbol than as a writer. Women’s studies? How about all those poor men throughout history who actually wanted to be enlightened, sensitive men but felt just as pressured by society to conform to some other norm. Will their story never be told?
The title of this post makes me laugh.
You know…by this man’s logic, having sex with a woman would be beastiality, since women are not human. And if men never slept with women because of the fact that they are not human, then no one would be born, and then humanity would end. That would kinda suck. (At least for humans.) I can’t say for sure but I think maybe he’s just mad because he could never get a woman to sleep with him. Poor guy.
Wow, I think I know who this guy is. Crazy old guy who used to roam campus and tell his conspiracy theories to anyone who would listen. If it’s not the same guy, that’s scary… there are TWO of them out there!!
NOT JUST TWO! HUNDREDS!!!! AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!
This guy should work on his grammar before he insults women and verbs. They can’t do Life, they can’t do earth.
nope. sorry, i cannot have sex with earth or life, if thats what you mean by “do”.
i can however, crush any and every argument this guy ever makes since he’s such an idiot, i know about life than he does because i accept that both women and men are a part of life. as for earth…. how does one not do earth? are we aliens? are weaklings/ are we stupid?
Gwell, to the asshole who wrote that email: GUESS WHAT? I’m extremely human and i could kick your ass. in fact, I could have about 17 other guys kick your ass AFTEr i get done with you.
Don’t insult women. We hold far too much power.
wow lots of typos. are we weaklings? Well … AFTER
there. much better.
“Jeepers. You’re looking like a bunch of fools.”
LOL Oh, yes, because teaching things like Sociology and Management and *gasp* Women’s Studies are just ridiculous.
I’m sorry, but I’m not sure what the verb thing even had to do with his original argument. I must have missed something. Maybe because I don’t do Earth?
Oh, you sad, lonely man. I’m so glad I don’t have to meet you in person.
Alright. Verb=action word. Therefore if “we” cannot verb….we cannot “suck, f**k, lick, etc. Therefore we cannot please. But, ahhhhh “we” can. And “we” do. Apparently he is void of that kind of “we” in his life. Perhaps he needs to find a good “verbing” hot woman to “verb” him a little. May do his lonely butt some good. Ta
“fake nonsense”=truth? so truth is never good? i pray that someone kicks this guy’s balls if he’s serious.
Looks like someone got dumped…
I was unaware I do not use verbs… hmmm
Women be verbin’ baaaaad
i, also was quite unaware that i do not use verbs. this development is quite interesting considering i like to write short stories in my free time.
waitaminut… has HE done the Earth?! what the hell?
I’m glad someone else realized that women are not people… I’ve been saying this for years.